 |
tzone Educate Communicate and Inform with transgenderzone.com
|
| Welcome |
|
|
Welcome to tzone.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today! |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Claudia Tzoner


Joined: 09 Feb 2007 Posts: 227
|
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 8:37 am Post subject: MtF/FtM - different issues? |
|
|
This is something I have been pondering for some time and I wondered what individual and different challenges that genetically male and genetically female transsexual people face (I do not say MtF and FtM strictly as not all people consider themselves to be this).
Some of the points I came up with were:
For MtFs or male born transgendered people:
- Have more issues with being confused with transvestitism and sexual arousal
- More frowned upon for "cross-dressing"
- More well known
- Tend to adhere more to the female norm compared to FtM, especially those with more 'traditional' viewpoints on what is a 'real' transsexual (doesn't mean that a significant proportion still don't, however)
- Some inevitably have to be open about their status since hormones cannot make enough change in some cases
- Seen by some as "lowering" themselves from male privilege
- Tend to be under more pressure to conform to the male stereotype pre-transition which can be distressing when transition starts and this is undone
For FtMs or female born transgendered people (obviously I don't have experience of this so others can elaborate)
- Less well known
- Issues with sex due to insufficient or expensive SRS
- May be accused of wanting "male privilege"
- Possible ostracization in former lesbian/feminist communities (less MtFs seem to be in former gay male communities)
Any thoughts? _________________ It's never too late to be who you might have been. - Mary Ann Evans
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stella Maru

Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Posts: 2248 Location: Brighton
|
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think it would be fair to say the social situations of MtFs and FtMs are not mirror images of each other.
The pantomime lead boy played by a girl is not exposed to the scorn and ridicule reserved for the MtF Ugly Sisters whose images haunt television advertising and the tabloid world-view.
Feminist 'historians' have even been able to claim - usually without producing any evidence - that notable cross-dressed women of the past cross-dressed only to escape patriarchal oppression and such, but afford no such license to their interpretation of MtFs.
The thing is to remember that trans folk are already a community riven by sectional interests, with insecure transsexuals vilifying transvestites, others deciding who is, and who is not, a "true transsexual", with those that "pass" decrying those who do not, with those who can afford private surgical procedures thinking themselves a better class than those who cannot, and so on.
So let's not add to this re-creation of "the other." 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cayden
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 412
|
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
i think one which counts for both would be, constantly having to explain themselves when their voice gives them away.
but i definatly think that theres alot of differences in the challenges faced by male born and female born transsexuals. _________________ 僕は男の人です
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Reenie Reporter


Joined: 08 Feb 2007 Posts: 3577 Location: Glasgow
|
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Stella Maru wrote: | | The thing is to remember that trans folk are already a community riven by sectional interests... |
If we channelled our energies outwards instead of wasting them squabbling amongst ourselves, we might be a force to be reckoned with. _________________ The Daily Turnout - King of the Throne Room
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thedreadpersephone Advisor


Joined: 09 Feb 2007 Posts: 913 Location: Dundee
|
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 11:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Stella Maru wrote: |
The thing is to remember that trans folk are already a community riven by sectional interests, with insecure transsexuals vilifying transvestites, others deciding who is, and who is not, a "true transsexual", with those that "pass" decrying those who do not, with those who can afford private surgical procedures thinking themselves a better class than those who cannot, and so on.
So let's not add to this re-creation of "the other."  |
I think it's a shame that the gay rights movement lost the support of passionate trans activists like Silvia Rivera (who eventually grew disillusioned with the whole thing as trans people's rights were pushed aside) back in the post Stonewall days. I would hate to see the same thing happen if MtFs and FtMs split into two distinct groups or if gender variant and more traditional transsexuals split into two groups.
Equally I could point out all the differences between lesbians and gay men or gay people and bisexuals, but I don't think there is much to be gained from that. Of course we all have different experiences, but that is part of what makes the LGBT community so interestingly diverse. As long as we have some common goals then we are much stronger together than apart._________________ Check out the Tzone team bios (including mine!) at: http://www.transgenderzone.com/bio.htm
Supporting the family, friends and partners of trans people in the UK: http://www.depend.org.uk/support.html
If you are struggling we will support you
If you are celebrating we will join you
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stella Maru

Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Posts: 2248 Location: Brighton
|
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| thedreadpersephone wrote: |
I think it's a shame that the gay rights movement lost the support of passionate trans activists like Silvia Rivera (who eventually grew disillusioned with the whole thing as trans people's rights were pushed aside) back in the post Stonewall days. |
I remember that there were about half-a-dozen trans women out of the seventy or eighty people who participated in the first Gay Liberation Front demonstration in Highbury Fields in 1970, but the following year there were no others that I could see.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Claudia Tzoner


Joined: 09 Feb 2007 Posts: 227
|
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 11:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| thedreadpersephone wrote: | | Stella Maru wrote: |
The thing is to remember that trans folk are already a community riven by sectional interests, with insecure transsexuals vilifying transvestites, others deciding who is, and who is not, a "true transsexual", with those that "pass" decrying those who do not, with those who can afford private surgical procedures thinking themselves a better class than those who cannot, and so on.
So let's not add to this re-creation of "the other."  |
I think it's a shame that the gay rights movement lost the support of passionate trans activists like Silvia Rivera (who eventually grew disillusioned with the whole thing as trans people's rights were pushed aside) back in the post Stonewall days. I would hate to see the same thing happen if MtFs and FtMs split into two distinct groups or if gender variant and more traditional transsexuals split into two groups.
Equally I could point out all the differences between lesbians and gay men or gay people and bisexuals, but I don't think there is much to be gained from that. Of course we all have different experiences, but that is part of what makes the LGBT community so interestingly diverse. As long as we have some common goals then we are much stronger together than apart. |
Indeed, I do agree, and it may be a good idea to bear in mind the differences within our group, but remember our unity in the face of those differences. _________________ It's never too late to be who you might have been. - Mary Ann Evans
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
william Tzoner

Joined: 08 Feb 2007 Posts: 765 Location: United Kingdom
|
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well i obviously can only speak from my point of view of a male in the community i suppose.
yes, transgendered men are less well known among the public in general. when you mention a transgendered person, people automatically talk about transgendered women as though they're the only kind of transsexual there is.
transgendered guys are becoming a bit more exposed, but most people wrongly assume (either from media portrayals that are bizarrely played by cisgendered women) that transgendered guys will look like a butch female.
of course, they are immensely surprised, and often in disbelief, when they meet a real transgendered male and realise they would not be able to distinguish him from his cisgendered counterpart.
but even with exposure, trans guys will always be invisible because T changes them so dramatically into, well, ordinary looking blokes. there are no ''give aways''.
of course, pre-T a lot of guys will either look like young boys or butch females (depending on how lucky they are with their genetics) and sometimes, especially if they are the latter, the higher voice can be a give away. in the former though, the voice would fit the ''young boy'' they're seen as.
a lot of trans guys face the ''age issue''. where they look a lot younger than they really are. i like this, in a way, and i make a joke out of it all the time, but sometimes it can be quite annoying when you're in age restricted zones and you get asked to leave before they even ask for ID...because they think there is no way you could possibly be even near legal! of course, that's where actual ID comes in handy.
as a gay lad, who's only ever been in the gay community i won't experience the shunning of any sexuality group because i nicely blend in there- in the group i belong in. i find the kind of 'twink' look gets me a lot of unwanted attention among gay men though.
sex hasn't been a problem at all, nor is it compromising anything for me or my partner. it's pretty perfect already, and i imagine it can only get better. it's a pretty normal gay relationship.
i can't really speak about what it's like to be accused of wanting male priviledge, because i haven't been, ever. but then i'm pretty young and seen as a boy, not a man, anyway. but in the days of equality and every sex having equal opportunities in life i don't see how ''male priviledge'' can affect anyone's life beyond having to listen to old sexist opinions. and people's opinions aren't going to affect your opportunities at all.
i guess girls aren't so lucky that their voice can't be unbroken and sometimes hormones don't do enough physically...but then again i've seen plenty of transgendered girls who are just as female looking as cisgendered girls. _________________ forum moderator
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hellfrozeover Advisor


Joined: 08 Feb 2007 Posts: 773 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Or we could just not care or attempt to one-up each other. It's a temporary disorder if you choose it to be. I see mine as just that so I'm not really caring about these things. They don't affect me or most girls in the situation that I know on a day to day basis. _________________ Hellfrozeover be a pirate and a Transgenderzone moderator.
I don't stand under the TG umbrella anymore, it's way too bitchy and crowded in there but it's sunny out here 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
william Tzoner

Joined: 08 Feb 2007 Posts: 765 Location: United Kingdom
|
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hellfrozeover wrote: | | It's a temporary disorder |
i agree. that's exactly how i see it. _________________ forum moderator
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Claudia Tzoner


Joined: 09 Feb 2007 Posts: 227
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 10:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, it can be a temporary disorder, for those who wish to normalise their lives and no longer live in the "trans" community or those who do not wish to think about trans issues too much, which is certainly what I am aiming to do, which helps - although it is not always the case - some can still suffer gender dysphoria from memories as their previous gender even well into transition, and can be triggered by such things as being with family who do not accept well, etc - and for some who do not look entirely like the gender they are, it can be a constant issue, unfortunately. _________________ It's never too late to be who you might have been. - Mary Ann Evans
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hellfrozeover Advisor


Joined: 08 Feb 2007 Posts: 773 Location: UK
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Everything is choice. They can choose to leave their families. I'm not saying they should but they can and they can work their arses off and get FFS. If someone really wants something, they'll get it(within reason). Some doctors will even risk shoulder reduction but you have to really look for them. I really do think our differences are a bit of a non-issue though. We all have to do it and it's harder for some, easier for others regardless of gender. Of course there are differences but I really don't think it makes any one side easier or it more acceptable for one to play the martyr. _________________ Hellfrozeover be a pirate and a Transgenderzone moderator.
I don't stand under the TG umbrella anymore, it's way too bitchy and crowded in there but it's sunny out here 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SignalFailure

Joined: 10 Aug 2007 Posts: 80 Location: Leeds
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 5:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That’s an interesting mentality. One that I am jealous of.
The thought of one day being ‘cured’ has never even crossed my mind. As far as I am aware being trans* is inherently a compromise between what you started with and what medical science is able to achieve.
Correct me if I am wrong, but from my own understanding medical science has not succeeded in changing anyone’s gender totally. What they can do is rearrange in order to give a cosmetic appearance to fit the gender association of the individual. In fact, to say that a cure exists is to deny your transient nature and that seems somewhat troublesome.
Now, please don’t misinterpret this as a ‘want’ to be trans*. It is more an acceptance of my own history and therefore future. If I was not trans* would I be the person I am today? No. I wouldn’t, my life experiences would be different etc etc … and this might be controversial, but I quite like who I am and being trans*, however much I may dislike it, is apart of that. To deny that to myself, i.e. by thinking of myself as ‘cured’ is to deny my own nature. Of course I am not saying that I should go out and scream from the roofs about my history, in fact I would one day assume that I shall be stealth, just because I don’t openly talk about it doesn’t mean it’s disappeared like an inflection, I hate to say it but should we not be proud of who we are? If not openly then at least to ourselves?
But is this merely a pessimistic view formed by a pessimistic mind?
Are my understandings of medical science wrong?
Am I forming answers to questions that I am in no position, as having not been ‘cured’, understand let alone answer?
I do however find the assumption that medical science can solve all these issues insulting. Insinuating that those who are not ‘cured’ are merely too lazy to get the money together to have surgeons cut away at their face is disrespectful. Acceptance of ones transient nature is not a marker of defeat but in many ways one of victory. Please do not assume that because it is possible for you that it is possible for everyone, and in doing so judge those who choose a different path.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hellfrozeover Advisor


Joined: 08 Feb 2007 Posts: 773 Location: UK
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not proud of being trans but I'm not ashamed of it either. I see myself more as having an intersexed past than being trans. I just don't understand transitioning to be a transsexual and not a gender. I can see alot of what you're saying but I really don't see myself identifying as trans at all, especially once it's all sorted as far as it can be. Some cis women are born with no internal vagina which has to be reconstructed in a way similar to our's, some are just plain infertile. It happens. If medical advances can't give some cis women fertility then we'll be on the same boat as them really, not any more disadvantaged. _________________ Hellfrozeover be a pirate and a Transgenderzone moderator.
I don't stand under the TG umbrella anymore, it's way too bitchy and crowded in there but it's sunny out here 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Juz Advisor


Joined: 09 Feb 2007 Posts: 1000
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 7:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
SignalFailure: +100
The only thing I can't agree with, is the "being proud" bit. Even for myself, I'm not proud of what I am, I find it very uncomfortable, rather shameful and I wish I'd been born as I should have been.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|